|
Rainy-day Fund: Lexington’s Financial Security Lexington’s Urban County Council is elected to represent the citizens and taxpayers of Fayette County. I believe most Lexingtonians expect local government to carefully invest their tax dollars, be fiscally conservative, and save surplus revenues for use in an emergency or major economic downturn. The financial security of our city is the council’s top priority. Last month by a vote of 13-1 and after an extended period of evaluation, the city council approved a revised economic contingency account – the “rainy-day fund”. The fund’s targeted balance is set at ten percent of the city’s general fund revenues or about $25 million. It may take a decade of savings to reach the targeted balance. The newly revised ordinance authorizes depositing about one million dollars annually into the fund (cash and interest earned) and 25 percent of each year-end budget surplus, if there be any. The amount of the annual rainy-day fund allocation is about 0.4 percent of general fund revenues. Why is the rainy day fund essential? Here are a few examples –
Mayor Teresa Isaac estimates that FY 07 general fund revenues will increase by $9.7 million and that a $7.0 million surplus will exist at the end of this fiscal year (June 30, 2006). Of course, as we know from past experience, actual tax revenues and budget surpluses are often considerably higher than the mayor’s estimates. Should Lexington take money out of the rainy-day fund when our government has a budget surplus and projects an increase in revenues for the coming year? What will local government do when the next economic downturn occurs? If there are limited cash reserves in the rainy-day fund, the only options left for local government are to reduce services and personnel, increase borrowing, and/or pass a tax increase. None of these options is attractive to the city’s employees, taxpayers, or those persons and organizations receiving financial assistance or aid from city government. Mayor Isaac’s FY 07 proposed budget takes $4.0 million from the “rainy-day” fund and eliminates any payments into the fund. This action will reduce the fund’s minimum anticipated balance at the end of next fiscal year from $9.0 million to $4.2 million. By comparison, the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government has over $64.0 million in its rainy-day fund. The mayor’s recommendation to tap the “rainy-day” fund indicates a lack of fiscal discipline. Lexington must operate its government within the revenue it receives from taxpayers. The Herald-Leader and Mayor Isaac have both lost touch with Lexington’s taxpayers. This issue is not “another political squabble with the mayor”. The “rainy-day” fund is a major philosophical difference between the “fiscally responsible” approach of the council and the “spend and tax” policies of the mayor. Lexington’s financial security should not be jeopardized by overspending or depleting an already severely under-funded “rainy-day” account. Ask Lexingtonians if they give the mayor an “A+ rating” regarding her recommended exploitation of the “rainy-day” fund.
Your comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
Councilman Ed Lane represents the 12 th District on Lexington Urban County Council. He is the owner of a commercial real estate services firm and publishes a statewide business magazine. To contact Ed Lane's 12th district council offices, e-mail him at edlane@lfucg.com.
|
|
Paid for by the committee to elect Ed Lane; Ron Switzer, treasurer. |